Amigos, Divided Print E-mail
Along the Texas-Mexico border, security fencing impacts more than illegal immigration.
Wednesday, 29 October 2008 | Catherine Cheney
When the mayor asked the two dissenting council members why they voted against the plan, they said they did not trust DHS. Twelve days later, government representatives insisted their hands were tied by the Secure Fence Act, which allows for the construction of physical barriers regardless of objections by local communities. Fence construction would proceed as originally proposed.

Foster worked with the Texas Border Coalition, a group of elected officials from El Paso to Brownsville, on two separate letters of objection. Neither received a response.

“The first time Eagle Pass got a letter, we were sued for 233 acres of land to begin the project,” Foster said of the ex parte lawsuit filed by DHS in January 2008. “We were sucker-punched.”

The Texas Border Coalition punched back, suing the Department of Homeland Security, but ultimately Foster lost the fight.

City Attorney Eddie Morales said Eagle Pass officials ultimately gave DHS right of entry to the property because they determined it would be “impossible” to win their case against the government.

The United States Army Corps of Engineers and DHS have now begun construction on 1.5 miles of fencing in Eagle Pass, a project they aim to complete to “a point of no return” by December 2008.

Salt Cedar Security

The Department of Homeland Security claims that the fence, in combination with doubling the size of border patrol and upgrading to the newest technologies, will help prevent undocumented immigrants, terrorist threats, and illegal substances from crossing the border.

“The bottom line that people need to recognize is that the operational need for the fence is driving our priorities here,” DHS spokesperson laura Keehner told the Globalist. “Community activists and landowners need to understand that this is something that is operationally necessary for national security.”

According to DHS, the fence will force illegal traffic to pass through the miles of border left unfenced, which will improve the monitoring capabilities of Border Patrol.

Project construction stages vary across the border, but Keehner explained that fencing progress in California, Arizona, and New Mexico is much further along than in Texas.

Leaders of many Texas border towns have fought fervently against the fence. They argue that the Rio Grande, which has served as a natural boundary between Texas and Mexico since 1848, should be reinforced with technology and security before the govern- ment resorts to physical barriers.

“Our position is that security is a priority, but we feel we can secure Texas if we eradicate the cane and salt cedar and update our technology,” Foster said in reference to the nonnative brush lining the Rio Grande that provides a hiding spot for undocumented immigrants.

Foster offered an explanation for the disconnect with decision-makers in Washington. “San Diego, California, is the only border sector with a Congressional liaison office in Washington, and the only border area that Congress officials can take a direct flight to,” Foster said. “Congress officials return from their visits to San Diego thinking they’ve seen a representative sector of the border, when that is far from the truth.” He accused the government of applying blanket policies like the fence that overlook the inherent differences between the Texas-Mexico border and other border regions.

From Fighting to Adjusting

Despite objections by local officials, construction is under way and already impacting every citizen in Eagle Pass.

Since flood planes prevent construction along the river, DHS must build through private property and public grounds to meet its construction goal in Eagle Pass. Consequently, the new border fence will separate the city from its public park and divide Eagle Pass from the intake system for its water supply.