| Amigos, Divided |
|
|
| Along the Texas-Mexico border, security fencing impacts more than illegal immigration. | ||
| Wednesday, 29 October 2008 | Catherine Cheney | |
|
Page 2 of 3 When the mayor asked the two dissenting council members why they voted against the plan, they said they did not trust DHS. Twelve days later, government representatives insisted their hands were tied by the Secure Fence Act, which allows for the construction of physical barriers regardless of objections by local communities. Fence construction would proceed as originally proposed. Foster worked with the Texas Border Coalition, a group of elected officials from El Paso to Brownsville, on two separate letters of objection. Neither received a response. “The first time Eagle Pass got a letter, we were sued for 233 acres of land to begin the project,” Foster said of the ex parte lawsuit filed by DHS in January 2008. “We were sucker-punched.” The Texas Border Coalition punched back, suing the Department of Homeland Security, but ultimately Foster lost the fight. City Attorney Eddie Morales said Eagle Pass officials ultimately gave DHS right of entry to the property because they determined it would be “impossible” to win their case against the government. The United States Army Corps of Engineers and DHS have now begun construction on 1.5 miles of fencing in Eagle Pass, a project they aim to complete to “a point of no return” by December 2008. Salt Cedar Security The Department of Homeland Security claims that the fence, in combination with doubling the size of border patrol and upgrading to the newest technologies, will help prevent undocumented immigrants, terrorist threats, and illegal substances from crossing the border. Despite objections by local officials, construction is under way and already impacting every citizen in Eagle Pass. |
Latest Blog Entries
Most Read
This magazine is published by students of Yale College. Yale University is not responsible for its contents.



