MENU

The Yale Globalist

MENU
  • About Us
    • What is the Globalist?
    • Executive Board 2019-2020
    • Advisory Board
  • Print
    • 2019-2020 Issues
      • Rwanda
    • 2018-2019 Issues
      • Morocco
      • Empathy
        • Empathy Sidebars
      • Move
      • Sacred
    • 2017-2018 Issues
      • Ghana
      • Reckoning
      • Authority
      • Relics
    • Features
    • Glimpses
    • Letters from…
    • Q&A
  • TYG Online
    • Beat Blogs
      • Crichton: Away at Home
      • Davila: Geopolitical Jabber
      • Hatibie: Indonesia’s Forgotten Genocide
      • Margolis: Revisiting the Paris Agreement
      • Morneau: Hardship and Hope in Sub-Saharan Africa
      • Sapsford: Silk Road Soliloquies 
      • Wolpert Gaztambide: En Flama
    • The Globalist Notebook
      • About Our Bloggers
    • The World at Yale
      • The Vicarious Globetrotter
    • Summer Blogs
      • Summer 2011
      • Summer 2012
      • Summer 2013
      • Summer 2015
      • Summer 2016
    • Encounters
    • Online Exclusives
    • Reporting Trips
      • Morocco 2018
      • Ghana 2017
      • Peru 2016
      • Balkans 2015
      • Vietnam 2014
      • Southern Africa 2013
      • Chile 2012
      • Turkey 2011
      • Indonesia 2010
  • Creative
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
    • Donate
  • +

Choosing to Move

November 15, 2018 • Beat Blogs, Morneau: Hardship and Hope in Sub-Saharan Africa • Views: 624

Part 2 of a series: Hardship and Hope in Sub-Saharan Africa

By Clare Morneau 

Refugee camps are far from anyone’s ideal living situation: they are often overcrowded, underfunded and frequently dangerous. However, refugee camps can sometimes be the best alternative to an extremely difficult and dangerous situation in an individual’s home country.

With a population of over 200,000 registered refugees and asylum seekers, the Dadaab refugee complex in Kenya is the largest refugee camp in the world, consisting of four camp settlements: Dagahaley, Ifo, Ifo 2, and Hagadera. These settlements are primarily occupied by Somali refugees, who arrived in the camps in two waves. The first wave, which coincided with the creation of the camp in 1991, was prompted by a Somali civil war. The second wave, occurring exactly two decades later in 2011, was the result of widespread drought and famine in Somalia.

For the refugees who fled Somalia and ended up in the Dadaab refugee complex in Kenya, the camp settlements are better than the situation they are fleeing, providing a safe haven of sorts. Unfortunately, this safety has been increasingly threatened by the presence of Somali al-Shabaab militants in the camp. It is arguably the actions of al-Shabaab militants that have added fuel to the Kenyan government’s argument for shutting down the Dadaab refugee complex. After two and a half decades of existence, the Kenyan government announced plans to shut down the Dadaab refugee complex on November 30, 2016. According to the government, the camp’s presence was causing instability and danger for Kenyan civilians, and the government felt the need to prioritize the safety of its own citizens.

This announcement spurred protest from the international community and non-governmental organizations alike, resulting in the closure being delayed for six months on the basis of humanitarian grounds. Following this delay, the action to shut down the camp was struck down when brought to a court based on violations of international law, namely the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees. This decision was a huge relief to many refugees, as the threat of closure made some feel as though they were being coerced back to their countries of origin and into a potentially life-threatening situation.

This situation raises important questions about refugee hosting and the stress it causes. Although Dadaab is primarily run by the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR), there is pressure on the Kenyan government to have responsibility and maintain a level of security in their country. For refugees, there is an intense feeling of loss and a sense of homelessness, as many feel as though they have no future in a refugee camp but are not able to return home. It is critical to address how this can be balanced. Are there solutions to the problems created by refugee hosting that do not involve forcing refugees back into conflict situations?

One way that the UNHCR has begun to address these issues is by running a voluntary repatriation program in the Dadaab refugee complex. In order to address the strain that the camps place on the Kenyan government, as well as the desire that some refugees have to return home, the UNHCR has established a program to allow for return. This program allows refugees to travel back to their home countries if they so choose, after being fully informed about the conflict or environmental state of the country. For some refugees, the decision to return home is to reunite with family members, and for others, it is to assess whether there is a life for them to go back to there.

If this voluntary repatriation of refugees to their countries of origin, particularly Somalia, increases, perhaps the Kenyan government will be put at ease. It currently seems like the only way to strike a balance in this situation, is by minimizing some of the government strain felt in the responsibility to host over 200,000 refugees in just this camp alone. However, it is also necessary to avoid the human rights violations that come from forcing refugees out of the country against their will. At the end of the day, the priority should be ensuring that refugees are safe and feel safe—and that if they move, it is because they choose to do so.

Clare is a sophomore in Morse College. You can contact her at clare.morneau@yale.edu. 

Tags: Kenya, refugee, refugee camp, somalia

Comments are closed.

About the Author

Clare Morneau

» Beat Blogs, Morneau: Hardship and Hope in Sub-Saharan Africa » Choosing to Move
Previous post:
Protecting Economic Interests or Human Rights?: The International Community’s Response to Jamal Khashoggi’s Murder
Next Post:
Diagnosing and Curing Japan: Why Japan is dying, and how to revive it
  • Related Posts

  • A Quest for Empathy in Kenya: Wisdom in...

  • Hope and First Steps in Kakuma Refugee Camp

  • Critical Refuge: Sculptures by Mohamad Hafez

  • No Arms, No Cake: Danes at Odds with...

Tags

Activism Afghanistan Africa art Asia Chile China cities climate change conflict culture development economics economy education environment Europe food France health human rights immigration India Islam Israel Istanbul japan Latin America media Middle East military Morocco music on theme Peru Politics refugees religion Russia South Africa Turkey United Nations United States women Yale in the World
The Yale Globalist is Yale University's only quarterly international affairs publication written, reported, designed, and produced entirely by undergraduates. For information on how to get involved, please contact Editors-in-Chief Vy Tran and Claire Zalla at vy.tran@yale.edu & claire.zalla@yale.edu

Powered by Wordpress. Designed by Themnific™